Monday, November 01, 2010

How Many Democrats Will Vote for Ehrlich?

Tomorrow’s gubernatorial contest between Bob Ehrlich and Martin O’Malley will depend on two things: turnout and the percentage of Democrats voting for Ehrlich. We’ll address turnout in tomorrow’s election forecast. Today, we’ll focus on Ehrlich Democrats.

Bob Ehrlich, and any statewide candidate, needs to have Democratic votes to win. That’s because of the Democrats’ immense edge in voter registration. Democrats account for 56.4% of all voters eligible to vote in the general election, a percentage that has changed little in the last decade. Republicans account for 26.7% of all voters eligible to vote in the general election, down from 30.1% in May 2004.


How many Democrats are willing to vote for Ehrlich? Let’s look at the history of polling in the three gubernatorial races in which Ehrlich has participated. Not all polls release cross-tabulations, and many of the older ones are no longer online, but this is our best shot at a roundup.

Percentage of Democrats Supporting Ehrlich, 2002 Cycle

Gonzales, September 2001: 11%

Gonzales/Arscott, January 2002: 16%

Gonzales, July 2002: 18%

Gonzales, August 2002: 21%

Gonzales, September 2002: 24%

Gonzales, October 2002: 25%

Survey USA, November 2002: 29%

Ehrlich, who was then a Baltimore County Congressman, started this race with less name recognition than Lieutenant Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend. But as the election season went on, his poll numbers went up – driven largely by steady gains among Democrats. The last Survey USA result, taken 48 hours before the election, reflects the current conventional wisdom that Ehrlich can win with 30% support among Democrats. Ehrlich defeated Townsend by 3.9 points.

Percentage of Democrats Supporting Ehrlich, 2006 Cycle

Gonzales, April 2006: 16%

Survey USA, September 2006: 16%

Survey USA, October 2006: 16%

Survey USA, November 2006: 18%

CNN Exit Poll, November 2006: 15%

Ehrlich stayed in the mid-teens among Democrats for most of the election season. Given that performance, he was unable to close the gap against Baltimore Mayor Martin O’Malley even with decent job approval ratings. O’Malley defeated Ehrlich by 6.5 points.

Percentage of Democrats Supporting Ehrlich, 2010 Cycle

Gonzales, January 2010: 16%

Magellan, July 2010: 25%

Public Policy Polling, July 2010: 21%

Gonzales, July 2010: 19%

Washington Post, September 2010: 10%

Gonzales, October 2010: 17%

Baltimore Sun, October 2010: 17%

Washington Post, October 2010: 7%

Two polls in July showed Ehrlich breaking 20% among Democrats. The Public Policy Polling survey showed Ehrlich trailing O’Malley by three points and claiming 21% support among Democrats. The Magellan poll showed him with a three-point edge over O’Malley and 25% support among Democrats. (It’s worth noting that Magellan works primarily for Republicans.) Since then, five polls have shown Ehrlich’s Democratic support varying between 7% and 19%. That’s in the neighborhood of his losing reelection campaign in 2006.

But 2010 is a wave year for the GOP. Can Ehrlich make it up in Republican turnout? We’ll find out tomorrow.

9 comments:

Robin Ficker said...

You omit an important factor: O'Malley raised the state sales tax 50%. Why don't you show the polls on the numbers of Democrats who approve of that?

Massachusetts, the most liberal state, has a question on its ballot tomorrow to roll back their state sales tax from 6.25% to 3%. It is ahead in the polls, although not by much. If it passes, look for companies to flock there.

jsmdlawyer said...

Great ghost of William Jennings Bryan, it's a Robin Ficker sighting! And as lucid and coherent as ever.

Today, let's talk math. If Johnny starts with five apples, and then he gets one more, how many does he have?

Robin?

That's right, he now has six. Very good, Robin.

Here's the hard question, now, so pay attention. What was the percentage increase in Johnny's apples?

Robin? Do you know the answer?

50%? No, I'm sorry, Robin, that's not right.

Does anyone else know the answer?

Billy?

Yes, Billy, that's right, the answer is 20%. One apple more as compared to five is 1/5 or 20%. Very good, Billy. Robin, see me after class to schedule some remedial math lessons.

Now here's one for the grown-ups. Just how bad would it be to let this guy on the County Council?

Answer: very.

Voters of District 2, take note, please. Y'all don't want to make me send you to detention.

Jonathan Shurberg

Sean P. Carr said...

A smaller sales tax -- or even better, none at all -- is all that is needed to produce a "flock" of new businesses in a state. That's why Oregon (10.3% unemployment rate) is a world economic power.

Robin Ficker said...

Jon, typo, it is only a 20% increase right next to Delaware which has no sales tax at all.

Jon, what was your SAT in Math? Let's compare.

Robin Ficker said...

Jon, does the cat have your tongue? Why did Craig Rice vote for the 20% increase in the state sales tax? Why does he say he "fought against" the millionaires tax when he was a sponsor of the bill? Why did Craig say he didn't oppose the Ficker Amendment requiring all 9 council votes to exceed the inflation rate on property tax increases when he was part of the Vote NO coalition that sent a mailing to every Montgomery County household with his name on it? Craig will support every tax incerase to come before the council if he is on it. Do you agree Jon?

Marc Korman said...

Is anyone else comforted that Robin Ficker is spending the day before the election at home (although I'm not sure in which district) blogging instead of talking to voters?

-Marc

Alan Banov said...

Marc,
I have a question for Mr. Ficker which is easier than your question about where he is registered to vote:
Which is more serious -not voting in a primary or being suspended indefinitely from the practice of law?
http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/inquiry/inquiryDetail.jis?caseId=21293M&loc=68&detailLoc=MCCI
Take your time, class.
For extra credit, how much did Mr. Ficker pay in court costs?
Alan Banov

jsmdlawyer said...

Dear Mr. Ficker:

I sincerely apologize for not staying glued to my computer, waiting breathlessly for the comedic pearls to drop from your lips like rose petals. Actual work, however, intruded -- you remember what that is, right?

As for my views (which, I must hasten to add, are MINE and are not attributable to anyone else), I think that the Ficker amendment is an abomination and our political leadership underestimated your pull on this one unfortunate occasion. I further believe that taxes are the price we all pay for living in a civilized society, and that your views are shortsighted, selfish and destructive. I hope you never get elected to anything, and if you decide to claim residence in yet another councilmanic district, I will make sure you don't get elected in mine -- District 5, FYI.

And last but not least, as anyone who knows me can attest, the cat's NEVER got my tongue.

Jonathan Shurberg

Robin Ficker said...

Jon, what was your math SAT? Don't be shy!

Question: If Craig can't manage a $40,000 budget, how can he manage a $4.4 billion one?