With Jane de Winter and Fred Evans reporting dismal fundraising numbers, there are only two at-large challengers with a shot to win: Becky Wagner and Hans Riemer. What are their chances?
Becky Wagner
Becky Wagner’s personality is shinier than a new silver dollar. MoCo is full of people with IQs surpassed only by their egos. Not Wagner. The long-ago comments by our spies were dead on: she is smart, extraordinarily gracious, a great speaker and aces interviews. People who meet her in person usually like her very much.
Wagner has never run for office before, so assessing her potential electoral performance is difficult. Her closest candidate analogue may be Nancy Floreen. Like Floreen, Wagner has deep roots in the community, support from business, and experience in the public arena. Unlike Floreen, she is on the Apple Ballot (which is good) and is running against four incumbents who are more or less sticking together (which is not good). Wagner’s message combines the pro-growth appeal of Nancy Floreen and the fiscal discipline of Duchy Trachtenberg. Because of that message overlap, their demographic similarity and their close residential proximity (Wagner in Bethesda, Trachtenberg in North Bethesda and Floreen in Garrett Park) the three women could be chasing many of the same votes.
We expect Wagner to do well in Bethesda because it is her home and the Apple Ballot made a strong showing there in 2006. That cuts directly into Trachtenberg’s base, since she won Bethesda last time when she was on the Apple. If Wagner erodes Trachtenberg’s area of strength and Trachtenberg cannot make it up elsewhere, Duchy will go home.
Could Becky Wagner win? It’s possible if Trachtenberg falters and Riemer does not live up to his hype, but we doubt it. Something has not clicked with this campaign. Wagner raised just $60,238 in outside contributions between January and August, less than half the outside contribution totals of Riemer ($130,782) and Floreen ($124,063) despite having substantial business support. She appears to be running the same sort of campaign as the incumbents, namely showing up at civic, public and candidate events and saving up a six-digit mail budget for use at the end. The incumbents can get away with that because of their superior name recognition. Wagner cannot. We are picking Wagner to finish sixth, with a small chance of fifth if Trachtenberg implodes.
Hans Riemer
Riemer’s campaign is one of the great stories of the election season. He has outraised all of the other at-large candidates, including the incumbents, since January. He has the support of both MCEA and the Post and his endorsement mix is better than anyone except Marc Elrich. He has reassembled much of the campaign team that won the 2009 special election for Nancy Navarro, including David Moon and Ken Silverman. And his ground game is easily the best in the at-large race, placing thousands of door-knocks and phone calls. Riemer’s opponents grumble about his brief history in the county and question his resume, but his supporters are excited and motivated.
Riemer ran for an open seat in District 5 in 2006. School board member Valerie Ervin blew him out by a 62-38% margin. Riemer won just six of forty-nine precincts, five of which were outside the Beltway, and Ervin crushed him in Takoma Park and Downtown Silver Spring. But Ervin is now Riemer’s ally and even his opponents expect him to run well in District 5. Since Riemer is on the Apple Ballot, he has a chance to run decently in places outside District 5 where the Apple performs well, including Chevy Chase, Bethesda and Potomac. His challenge will be to put together enough votes in the rest of the county to break through the incumbents.
Riemer has become something of a vessel for discontent with one or more of the incumbents. Organizations or individuals who have a problem with an incumbent have usually chosen Riemer as the alternative. For example, MCEA ditched Duchy Trachtenberg and Nancy Floreen in favor of Riemer (and Becky Wagner). The Post dropped George Leventhal and added Riemer. The AFL-CIO and SEIU dropped Trachtenberg and added Riemer. Progressive Maryland dropped both Floreen and Trachtenberg and added Riemer. The Sierra Club has never supported Floreen or Leventhal, but they added Riemer to their list along with past endorsees Trachtenberg and Elrich. And MANY people with whom we have spoken have voiced unhappiness with an incumbent or two (usually Floreen or Trachtenberg) and have included Riemer on their vote list. If Riemer is everyone’s fourth vote, he will win.
We are picking Riemer to finish anywhere from third to fifth. If his campaign skills, endorsements, money and work ethic can compensate for the incumbents’ starting name recognition, he will be headed to Rockville. If not, then the incumbents will likely have been invincible from the start. Riemer definitely benefits from a sense of momentum and the number of spies who believe he will win is growing. We will soon see if they are right.
Friday, August 27, 2010
Council At-Large: Becky Wagner and Hans Riemer
Posted by
Adam Pagnucco
at
7:00 AM
Labels: Adam Pagnucco, At-Large Data, Becky Wagner, Council At-Large, Hans Riemer
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


5 comments:
These are strong analyses, and I agree with your predicted outcomes, including the uncertainty how Hans Riemer will place although I don't see him as 3rd. My personal interactions with his campaign, which has fallen short on follow through and coordination, is not as strong as many think. Of course, this is not a reflection on his qualification to hold office.
There is more to Hans than meets the eye.
To begin with, what does he actually do at AARP? His self-selected title of “Senior Advisor” sure leaves a lot to the imagination. But surely, so senior an adviser would be listed on the AARP website? Not so. A search on the AARP site yields only three articles from 2005 citing his work for Rock the Vote. In fact, a Google search for “Hans Riemer” “AARP” shows not a single (I stopped looking after three pages) result that indicates that Hans is an actual employee of AARP. So, my question is, does Hans have an actual JOB? And if not, then what exactly is it in his background that qualifies him to represent almost a million working people in Montgomery County?
Another thing, Hans often cites his work for the Obama campaign, but it seems that Hans no longer worked for the campaign sometime after February/March of 08. Hardly leaving a sinking ship, why would one choose to leave one of the greatest campaigns of all time, right before a primary victory and with more work to do in the general? Clearly, it wasn’t to take a job at AARP! During the general, the youth outreach was run by a woman by the name of Leigh Arsenault. What happened to Hans? Why did he leave? Was it his choice, or was he fired? If so, why? Many, many questions to be answered.
There’s something rotten in Denmark!
Howard Russell
Bethesda
Adam,
I like your post. Generally spot on, especially with Becky.
I have 5 points that should be made about your analysis. I call it "Five Reasons Why Hans is Weaker Than You Acknowledge".
I know you are a HUGE Hans guy -- going back to his run against Valerie in 2006 so you might have missed these points but I think they are worth mentioning.
Point #1: I think that the same geographic problems face Hans that Becky has. She has to content with two women close to her geographically in Nancy Floreen and Duchy, Hans has the top two vote getters from 2006 -- both male -- even closer to him physically than Becky has her female counterparts.
So if you are going to discount Becky's shortcoming geographically than please consider the impact George and Marc have on Hans. In fact, the strength of George and Marc in District 5 is far stronger than Nancy and Duchy's strength in District 1.
Yet there is no mention of that as a potential weakness for Hans. Should be.
Point #2: Not all of Valerie's supporters will be with Hans. Probable (because of her endorsement) but not a sure thing.
You are correct Hans has out raised his opponents (a tip of the cap) and has an experienced team in place. He does have a strong list of endorsements (another tip of the cap). But you are ignoring this key weakness in Hans' campaign. He got hammered in 2006 in an open seat where he was the 1st one in and had the most money. Which leads to a MASSIVE REASON why he could be considered weak.
Point #3: The fact that he has only lived in the county for five years. During that five years he has run for office twice.
Point #3b: Also his experienced campaign team can't vote for him. None of the three paid employees for Hans are registered to vote in MoCo -- unless they did it after August 1.
It is this lack of deep roots that could very well hold him back. People like him but I think many voters like to have someone who has lived here longer before running for office.
It was a key factor in 2006 when I lived in District 5. I voted for Valerie for two reasons: her experience on a range of MoCo issues and time spent in the county. Hans on the other hand was going to vote for the 1st time in MoCo when his name was on the ballot. To me, it was too much too soon. Prove yourself on local issues first then run. How many people in 2010 that live upcounty feel the same way I did in 2006?
I believe that is one of more compelling reasons for why Valerie beat him so convincingly in 2006.
Hans worked very hard in 2006 I know. I saw him everywhere. People liked him in 2006 but they did not vote for him. The electoral results don't show the amount of effort he put in.
Points #4 and #5 to come.....
Adam,
Here are my final two reasons of on my subject: "Five Reasons Why Hans is Weaker Than You Acknowledge".
Point #4: District 5 has to come out as strongly as they did in 2006 when there were great races for State Senate, State Delegate, County Executive, Comptroller (with a candidate from District 5), a big US Senate race, and compelling At Large race for the Council for Hans to have a chance. The same does not hold for the other challengers such as Jane and Becky. The low turnout will favor the incumbents. But Jane and Becky have IMO the upper hand compared to Hans (Point #5 below).
Hans will need to District 5 voters to give him 25% vote with two others Takoma Park candidates on the ballot (George and Marc) then yes he can perhaps crack the top four.
Slating with George and / or Marc would be a huge help. And you point out they are not working with Hans.
Point #5: The Democratic voter is 50% more female than male. It is called the gender gap. You fail to mention that. How come?
Look at 2006 At Large again. Cary Lamari ran hard and he came in behind Bette Petrides who did not have his money and I never saw her on the campaign trail (and I was working county wide for Marc) so I think I would have seen her at least once. But she out polled Cary. Why? Two reasons. Gender and the fact that she held office in Glen Echo.
So how does Hans get the female vote when you have four strong females in the race: Duchy, Nancy, Becky and Jane.
In addition, if a woman voter does vote for a male don't you think the experience of Marc and George will count for something??? I do.
You have a blind spot for Hans. And yes he has run a great campaign but you were a HUGE Hans fan in 2006 and look at the results areas that you worked for him. He only wins 6 of 35 precincts and now he has the electoral strength to compete over 245 precincts??? Not so sure your math holds.
So I am not as certain as you that he gets to at least fourth place. He could. But I think he also has a good chance of finishing behind Becky, Jane and all of the incumbents. I think the range is 4th place to 7th place.
He does have the resources, a talented team, and some big endorsements but will the habitual voter in a low turnout race vote for someone who is still new to the county?
I don't know. If he does it will be a great story. If not he may lose on par with his 2006 race.
Just a thought.
Howard, I have some answers to questions you have raised in your innuendo-laden post.
Hans indeed worked at AARP, as he and several other employees of that organization have told me. His role was to focus on healthcare and entitlement reform efforts in Congress. (You can verify this with a phone call to AARP if you'd like -- it's just as easy as doing a Google search.)
I met Hans when I was a journalist covering the Obama campaign.
He left the campaign in early 2010 due to family reasons: His son Henry was born in September 2009. As the campaign picked up steam, it became apparent that he would probably not be able to see Henry and his wife Angela for long stretches -- the campaign's headquarters were in Chicago and his family was in Silver Spring. He had to make a choice, and he left a pretty sweet job to be with his family.
Hope this clears things up for you.
Sincerely,
Andy Sullivan
Silver Spring
Post a Comment