Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Heard a Good Rumor?

There are MANY rumors floating around in the County Council races right now. Let’s be irresponsible and review a couple of them, shall we?

1. The Rockville consensus is that Craig Rice should and will win the Council District 2 seat. No one believes Sharon Dooley has a shot, and no one in either the council building or the Executive Branch wants to see combative former Planning Board Chair Royce Hanson get in. As a result, lots of people are wooing Rice and hoping to earn his vote later. Ike Leggett, for example, gave Rice $3,000.

2. The at-large incumbents loathe Hans Riemer and are picking up their whisper campaign against him. More than one person who has publicly supported him has told your author that they have been pressured by one or more incumbents to retract that support. There has been an intense effort to discredit Riemer and plant derogatory allegations about him in the media. One such allegation is that he has never worked for AARP. Your author knows that is a lie because Riemer would answer the phone at AARP when called there by yours truly.

3. A civic activist who despises Council President Nancy Floreen has started an illegal, anonymous anti-Floreen website and has begun erecting illegally-placed road signs calling for her defeat. The activist is known to be a supporter of Council Member Marc Elrich. Elrich denies responsibility for fomenting the anti-Floreen effort, but his pleas are not entirely believed. Rumors are spreading that the activist is planning an attack mailer against Floreen. This is beginning to stress the incumbents’ four-way mutual non-aggression pact.

4. Council Member George Leventhal has taken an increasingly hard line against challenger Becky Wagner in the at-large candidate forums. Leventhal is suspected by many of tacitly supporting Wagner a year ago, a charge he denies, and some are now accusing him of throwing Wagner under the bus as part of the incumbents’ deal.

5. Council Member Duchy Trachtenberg is so upset about the growing circulation of stories about her mishandling money while she was Treasurer of Maryland NOW that she is vowing to locate their source. Perhaps she should blame the Gazette, which originally reported on the issue. Our informants are wondering whether distraction over this matter explains why Trachtenberg, who is sitting on over $200,000 in the bank, has apparently not yet sent out mail.

6. More than one council incumbent has recently butted heads with Council Vice-President Valerie Ervin, who will likely become President this December. That is EXTREMELY unwise as Ervin will be determining committee assignments, including chairmanships. Ervin is a tough cookie who will not tolerate mischief and will break heads if she has to.

7. We’ll finish with something positive. Yes, we know such things bore you, but you received plenty of dirt above, so deal with it. The County Council and the county’s statehouse delegation are often criticized for not talking to each other, but that could change for the better. One example is that Council Member Roger Berliner, who has significant expertise on energy policy, and Delegate Brian Feldman (D-15), who sits on the House committee that oversees electric utilities, are collaborating on legislation to establish performance standards for Pepco. We don’t care what they come up with, but the very fact that they are working together may be a sign of good things to come.

12 comments:

Robin Ficker said...

Why should a Democrat feel motivated to vote for Craig Rice in a Democratic Primary when Craig himself did not vote in the Democratic primaries of 1996, 1998, 2000 and 2008!

Kevin Gillogly said...

Why should anyone vote for Robin Ficker when last year he claimed to live in Colesville and now claims to live in a part of MoCo that no one else knows exists: the "ag preserve"?

Robin it is called the "AG RESERVE" and where do you live?

Robin, are you shopping for an office, any office, so you can return to public life even more so than you are now???

Andy Marshall said...

Why should any Democrat feel motivated to listen to anything Robin Ficker says about any other Democrat?

There's a really good zombie or robot overlords joke in there, but I'll just leave it. Best of luck in your primary, Mr. Ficker. You're every MoCo Democrat's dream opponent.

Andy Marshall

Robin Ficker said...

Ok,Craig Rice, or Kevin or Andy or whatever you want to call yourself. What other elected official in Montgomery County of Democratic persuasion, failed to vote 9in the 2008 contest between Obama and Clinton? Half of life is showing up. I have never failed to vote in an election since 1964 when I got the right to vote. And I have voted for a Democrat or two. When you don't vote, you shouldn't even consider running the public office, Craig. Check with the Board of Elections to see your abysmal voting record, Craig.

Andy Marshall said...

I'm sorry, Mr. Ficker, I should have disclosed. I have no interest in the primary in which Craig Rice is running--I live in D39, and councilmanic District 3. And I did use your comment as an opportunity for a shot at you.

Though it pains me, as a county resident since shortly after you got the right to vote, to agree with you about even the color of the sky, it would be priggish and rude of me not to concede that, on the facts, you're right--half of life is showing up, and a candidate for office should certainly have a record of voting in both general and primary elections. Thanks.

Andy Marshall

Alan Banov said...

Mr. Ficker:
Do you think that failure to vote in prior Democratic primaries disqualifies candidates in the Democratic primary?
Alan Banov

Kevin Gillogly said...

Getting off the Robin train. Can never win with a heckler. Even when the facts are on your side. Robin, enjoy living in the Ag Preserve -- wherever it is.

Kevin Gillogly said...

Let's get back to the main point of this posting: to pass out rumors. Why?

What does this do to improve the political discourse. Adam, we (you, me & our blog-father) agreed about three years ago to not write or comment on rumors and things that do not improve the political discourse. The example we had back then was an elected official who was caught drinking and used his position to protect himself. To me, it was a non-issue. Still is.

So why post these rumors? Is this the farm league for the NY Post? I hope not. If it was I would have to print the postings just to line the bird cage.

More on these "rumors" in my next comment.

Kevin Gillogly said...

Ok let's go through these "rumors" put some of them to bed. I really wish we would run these rumors through our thinking cap before putting them out on MPW.

#1) Sharon Dooley has no shot. Really?

Yes, Craig has the institutional support. Craig has more money than Royce, Sharon, Eddie and Charles combined. But let's review a few other ideas...

#1a) A person who is part of that institutional support said to me last night Craig's district 15 is only 35% of District 2. That is a cause for concern. I agree. No mention of that in your rumor. Why?

#1b) Sharon is the only woman in the race. Remember what I wrote about the gender gap. I don't know the exact numbers in District 2 but I am willing to guess it the same as the rest of the county. That means there are 50% more women voters than men votes in the Democratic primary.

#1c) She is only person who has run in the entire District 2 previously.

#1c- 1) Ok, Craig in the only elected official and that counts for something.

#1d) Sharon is the only person from the Olney portion of the district. Huge electoral advantage.

#1e) Sharon got the Gazette endorsement which counts for something.

#1e 1) It is interesting the WaPo endorsed Royce and the Gazette endorsed Sharon and neither endorsed a well spoken elected official. That is not a rumor.

#2) Eddie Kuhlman, is an elected official in Poolesville, which is in Craig's base of District 15. So that will cut into Rice's votes. I heard him at the debate in Olney and for some he has the chops to be a player. Might not win. But if he does garner votes I believe it will be at the expense of Craig and Royce and less so to Sharon.

#3) Sharon garnered 36% of the vote against Knapp in 2006. If she holds to those numbers then she could win.

Finally, I have to let the readers know while I like Craig -- don't know the other men -- I would vote for Sharon if I lived in District 2. I live in District 4 and therefore can't vote.

But I did see one debate in Olney and otherwise know little about the race.

But your rumors from Rockville are just that. How about going out to some of the debates and listen to what people are saying?

Keith Berner said...

Thanks for your input here, Kevin. (And shame on Ficker, as usual, for hijacking the substance of a conversation for his own ends.)

#1 - This isn't a rumor, it's the reporting of a conjecture or prognostication

#2 - That the incumbents loathe Riemer is a fact, not a rumor. As for the rumor that he doesn't work at the AARP, it's ludicrous and ridiculous, paling in comparison to the rest of the bill of goods on Riemer. (Keep an eye on my blog for more on that.)

#3 - Furthering what is essentially a whisper campaign against Elrich is highly irresponsible. The important question here is motive: why would Elrich risk the peace pact to go after Floreen when (a) he is going to beat her soundly and (b) there is no challenger running whom he prefers. Adam, if you're going to write stuff like this, you owe your readers some decent analysis about it.

#4 - As long as Leventhal categorically denies that he encouraged Wager to run, concern about his having thrown her under a bus is a nonstory (except, maybe, for the two of them).

#5 - Yeah, there is considerable mystery about Trachtenberg and NOW. I just don't see how you get from that to a conjecture about why and when she is mailing or not. This seems like you're just trying to make a case for your (thus far) unprovable argument that she isn't using her campaign funds "wisely."

#6 - What?! Are you really suggesting that the thin-skinned and self-absorbed Ervin could take revenge on someone she doesn't like? Be still my beating heart! Are you really calling someone stupid for standing up to her bullying? What are need are more politicians who will stand up to bullies, even when it might not be the best move for self-preservation. Imagine: a politician willing to put principle over safety. I'd like to send a check to that individual.

Full disclosure: I support Elrich & Trachtenberg, am ambivalent about Leventhal, and oppose Floreen, Wagner, and Riemer.

Keith Berner said...

Thanks for your input here, Kevin. (And shame on Ficker, as usual, for hijacking the substance of a conversation for his own ends.)

#1 - This isn't a rumor, it's the reporting of a conjecture or prognostication

#2 - That the incumbents loathe Riemer is a fact, not a rumor. As for the rumor that he doesn't work at the AARP, it's ludicrous and ridiculous, paling in comparison to the rest of the bill of goods on Riemer. (Keep an eye on my blog for more on that.)

#3 - Furthering what is essentially a whisper campaign against Elrich is highly irresponsible. The important question here is motive: why would Elrich risk the peace pact to go after Floreen when (a) he is going to beat her soundly and (b) there is no challenger running whom he prefers. Adam, if you're going to write stuff like this, you owe your readers some decent analysis about it.

to be continued

Keith Berner said...

continued from previous

#4 - As long as Leventhal categorically denies that he encouraged Wager to run, concern about his having thrown her under a bus is a nonstory (except, maybe, for the two of them).

#5 - Yeah, there is considerable mystery about Trachtenberg and NOW. I just don't see how you get from that to a conjecture about why and when she is mailing or not. This seems like you're just trying to make a case for your (thus far) unprovable argument that she isn't using her campaign funds "wisely."

#6 - What?! Are you really suggesting that the thin-skinned and self-absorbed Ervin could take revenge on someone she doesn't like? Be still my beating heart! Are you really calling someone stupid for standing up to her bullying? What are need are more politicians who will stand up to bullies, even when it might not be the best move for self-preservation. Imagine: a politician willing to put principle over safety. I'd like to send a check to that individual.

Full disclosure: I support Elrich & Trachtenberg, am ambivalent about Leventhal, and oppose Floreen, Wagner, and Riemer.