Showing posts with label George Leventhal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Leventhal. Show all posts

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Where Was George?

The question that people are asking after receiving an email newsletter from Council President Valerie Ervin that is signed by all county councilmembers except George Leventhal:

Dear Friends of Montgomery County:

As the Council gears up for its busy fall schedule, we want to update you on some key issues the Council will be addressing. We also want to share with you our perspective on the Council's recent actions.

Issues we will consider this fall range from the curfew bill proposed by the County Executive to the post-Census redrawing of Councilmember district lines. We will also take up several land use master plans that are vital to strengthening our economy and improving our quality of life.

Our agenda so far this year has focused on the severe budget challenges that the County, like governments across the nation, has continued to face. The Council acted unanimously on issue after issue and approved a $4.4 billion County budget for Fiscal Year 2012. We listened closely to the comments we received from thousands of concerned County service recipients and taxpayers, we consulted extensively with our employee representatives, and ultimately we spoke with one voice on how best to close the huge gap between projected expenditures and resources.

The Council started with three priorities: to protect our core services - education, public safety, and assistance for our most needy residents; treat our taxpayers fairly; and provide equity among our employees. In a series of 9-0 votes on controversial issues, we did just that. Even though the overall approved budget was actually smaller than the budget approved three years ago, we targeted the reductions carefully. For MCPS and Montgomery College, we focused on areas that do not affect the classroom. For some core services, we felt that the reductions proposed by the County Executive cut too deeply, and so we restored limited funds to Police, Fire and Rescue, Health and Human Services, Libraries, and other key operations.

One of our top goals was to protect our hard-working employees and their families from layoffs. Another top goal was to ensure fair treatment for the employees of all County agencies. We felt that the County Executive's recommended changes to health and retirement benefits for County Government employees were too large, and so we made them more equitable.

Another essential goal was to protect classroom instruction in our world-class school system while ensuring that scarce resources are available for all our critical priorities. The $2.1 billion budget we approved for Montgomery County Public Schools will help create a stable future for our schools and all County agencies. The tax supported budget that we approved for the school system was an increase over the last fiscal year.

In June, despite these budget challenges, the three major bond rating agencies reaffirmed the County's critical AAA bond rating, but the continued turmoil in financial markets makes clear that our challenges are far from over.

We are proud of the way the Council came together to act unanimously on this year's difficult budget. We are deeply committed to progressive values, and all of us care deeply about the concerns of our taxpayers, service recipients, and employees in this economy. We will continue to do the best job we can for the County's one million residents.

Sincerely,


Valerie Ervin

Valerie Ervin

Council President

Roger Berliner

Council Vice President

Phil Andrews

Councilmember

Marc Elrich

Councilmember

Nancy Floreen

Councilmember

Nancy Navarro

Councilmember

Craig Rice

Councilmember

Hans Riemer

Councilmember

Read More...

Friday, October 22, 2010

George Leventhal for Council At-Large, 2002

George Leventhal won his first at-large council race in 2002 the same way he won his next two elections: with lots of endorsements, especially from MCEA. He devoted an entire mailer to education that year which we reprint below, but he couldn't help throwing in a quote from his former boss, U.S. Senator Barbara Mikulski.




Read More...

MoCo Primary 2010: George Leventhal Precinct Results

By District


By Local Area


By Race/Ethnicity

Read More...

Monday, October 18, 2010

MoCo Primary 2010: Council At-Large Precinct Results

Total Results (Including Absentees and Provisionals)


By District


By Local Area


By Race/Ethnicity

Read More...

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

End Gridlock Team, Council At-Large, 2002

During the entire 1998-2002 term, freshman Council Member Blair Ewing battled County Executive Doug Duncan on the ICC, development policy, living wage and other issues. In the spring of 2002, intense speculation centered on whether Ewing would challenge Duncan in the primary. Ewing instead formed a slate of challengers to take over the council, prompting Duncan to form his own slate: the End Gridlock Team. Duncan's team massively outspent Ewing and swept all the at-large seats. End Gridlock did many negative mailers, some of which we will be reprinting, but below is one of the positive ones.






Read More...

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

A Sign of the Times

A screenshot from Facebook.

Read More...

Friday, September 17, 2010

George Leventhal: Thank You

Council Member George Leventhal, who has won the Democratic primary for a third term, has sent the following email to his supporters. Leventhal is a canny political observer, having chaired the party's central committee for five years prior to his first election, and we agree with his remarks on the county's low turnout.

Dear [Voter],

Thank you so much for your support! I am honored to have won the Democratic Party's nomination for the third time to serve as an At-Large member of the Montgomery County Council. I will never forget the hundreds of friends who took the time to help my campaign, give me encouragement and make contributions. Working together, we won! We should all be proud of what we accomplished.

My congratulations to incumbents Marc Elrich and Nancy Floreen and newcomer Hans Riemer, who were also nominated in the Primary Election. The four of us will be running together as a Democratic slate. If you would like to keep your "Re-Elect Leventhal" signs up in your yards until the November 2 General Election, please feel free to do so.

We do have Republican opposition in the General Election but historically, the Democratic nominees for Montgomery County Council, At-Large have not encountered difficulty winning in November. I encourage you to join me now in turning our focus to the re-election of Governor Martin O'Malley, who shares our priorities of job creation, education and a healthy environment.

The most recent estimate shows that only 19.44% of eligible voters participated in the September 14 Primary Election in Montgomery County. If Montgomery County turnout remains low in the November 2 General Election, Governor O'Malley will have difficulty getting re-elected. I do not want to see Maryland go backwards. I would be very interested in your thoughts on how we can increase voter turnout in the fall.

Thank you again for all the support you have shown me. I look forward to serving you for another four years on the County Council. Please let me know if there is any way I can be of assistance to you.

Gratefully,
George Leventhal
Montgomery County Councilmember, At-Large

Read More...

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Special Spy Report: Council At-Large

The County Council At-Large race may be the most unpredictable primary in the county. Over and over again, we have consulted our spy network for insights into how it will play out. But this time we are checking in with a truly special group of informants:

State legislative candidates.

Why are we asking them, do you ask?

First, perhaps even more than the council candidates, the folks running for state legislature are on the doors. They see who has signs up. They see what literature has been dropped. They attend many of the same events at which the council candidates show up – or don’t show up. And they hear who is being talked about and what is said. In the years between elections, the delegation and the council don’t know very much about each other. But right now, the political radar is up.

Second, politicians know politics. They can size up other candidates – their message, their logistical capabilities, their knack for the game – a lot better than can lay people. Asking politicians about other politicians is like asking bank robbers about lock picks.

Third, while some of the state legislative candidates have endorsed one or more council candidates, they are not truly invested in those choices. They are far enough removed to have a more impartial point of view of the council election than the council candidates or their supporters. Frankly, the delegation members assume that the council will be dysfunctional regardless of who gets elected!

That said, most of the state legislative candidates we asked about the council at-large race did not venture an opinion. They are QUITE busy now, as you might expect. But twelve of them did give us their take on a super-confidential basis. Some are incumbents and some are not. They come from all over the county. Here’s what they told us about which council at-large candidates will be elected.

State Spy #1:

Probably the four incumbents. The reason: the dead weight of inertia. If an incumbent loses I would say it would be Duchy. Hans is in the best position to take advantage of an opening because he comes from vote-rich District 20.

State Spy #2:

1st place will be Marc Elrich - for his caring, astute, in-depth analysis of every issue, he knows more about the issues before them than any other member. 2nd Nancy Floreen - President of the Council can’t hurt and she has worked with the community continually since on the council. 3rd George Leventhal - knows how to reach a consensus with Executive and council. 4th Becky Wagner - She was 5th until the NOW issue is forcing Duchy to the back of the pack. Becky is sharp, understands what is needed and how to get it.

State Spy #3:

I think right now that it’s Leventhal, Elrich, Riemer, Trachtenberg, in that order. Leventhal and Elrich have had good all-around campaigns, though Leventhal is weak on field and Elrich on mail. Riemer’s campaign has been strong all around, and he has rolled up a lot of vital endorsements. Trachtenberg squeaks in on incumbency and the Jewish vote, though for someone with as much money as her the campaign has been lackluster to say the least. My two cents: I think she’s so confident of re-election that she is saving her money for an Exec race in four years. There is no end to that woman’s ego...

State Spy #4:

1. George Leventhal - Has maximized incumbency to his advantage. High visibility over his 8 years in office and corresponding high name ID matters in low turnout races.

2. Marc Elrich - Won in 2006 without much institutional support. Marc has broadened his appeal over the past 4 years and has key institutional support this time around, including both the Post and the Apple Ballot.

3. Hans Riemer - The general dissatisfaction with the current Council will cause one incumbent to go down. With the Post and Apple Ballot endorsements and what looks like the best field operation/campaign amongst all the challengers, Riemer appears best positioned to capitalize.

4. Nancy Floreen - Stumbles to the finish line on the strength of high visibility serving this year as Council President and the other inherent advantages associated with having been an incumbent for 8 years.

State Spy #5:

Leventhal, Elrich, Riemer, Trachtenberg. As much of a tool as Leventhal is, he has a lot of support and it is pretty clear he is going to be first. Elrich also has a lot of support, as he has spent a lot of time in the last four years building grassroots support so that it would not take a lot of money to run for re-election. Riemer is a force of nature this year and frankly deserves it. I’m just guessing on the last one, but I don’t see Wagner knocking off Duchy, as much as I wouldn’t mind it.

State Spy #6:

George Leventhal - He publicly admitted regret about spending which is refreshing because voters don’t hear too often elected officials understanding their mistakes. Despite the “throw the bums out” feeling in the electorate, the challengers are a little lackluster. The Community Conversations over the summer were fairly popular and having mail in mailboxes before everyone else made him standout.

Marc Elrich - Has built the broadest coalition in the entire county. Not easy to do in a bad economy. When the teachers union, Post, developers and environmental groups support you, there's really no one else to go against you. People pay attention that he is everywhere in the county and genuinely listens to every point of view. Despite some disagreeing with his conclusions about various issues, everyone knows that his thought process is untainted.

Nancy Floreen - Knows how to consistently come in the top four. Her creative mailers get a few seconds of hesitation before they end up in the recycling.

Hans Riemer - The voters are going to want at least one new person. Becky Wagner is significantly more qualified and would be a great councilmember, but she’s a first time candidate going against some real pros. He is going to win because so many groups and elected officials are supporting his campaign and he has the field organization and mail plan to let every voting Democrat know it.

State Spy #7:

I would say Leventhal, Trachtenberg, Elrich, and it will be a close race for 4th between Wagner, Riemer, and Floreen. Definitely too close to call but I would say that Riemer pulls it out based on ground game.

I think that Trachtenberg and Leventhal win because of their incumbent status/name recognition. And though he has not sent many, Elrich’s mail is by far the best I have seen over here.

State Spy #8:

My two cents (which is all this is worth), is that Nancy, George and Marc will likely be reelected. I think the fourth will be Hans or Becky -- with an edge to Hans. Nancy is generally well liked and is seen on the “news” often -- so, despite the negative website and signs about her, I think she’ll be fine. For whatever reason, people like George and he campaigns very hard. He’s not my choice but he’s in touch with voters and I believe he’ll be reelected. I think Marc appeals to many people --- he comes across as honest and sincere, despite some recent criticism. As a newcomer, Hans is campaigning hard and is connecting with people. But I think Becky has come a long way in the past three weeks and has some traction.

State Spy #9:

The incumbents, because despite the anger towards and discontent in Rockville, I don’t think the voter anger is directed in a single direction. However, Duchy seems to be sitting on her huge campaign account and not sending out much mail. So, though I would bet a few dollars on the incumbents, I wouldn’t be too shocked if Riemer wins and Duchy loses.

State Spy #10:

Marc Elrich, because he’s calm and usually level-headed and may be the only grown-up on the Council

George Leventhal, because he’s everywhere--nobody loves his explosive personality but everybody respects his commitment

Duchy Trachtenberg--a serious legislator with a good sense of how to run and win, may finish 4th because of a late start

There will be a photo-finish recount between

Nancy Floreen--ubiquitous on the campaign trail but grating

And

Hans Riemer--who has targeted MoCo seniors very effectively with non-stop calls and mail about his AARP work which make him a real force in the race despite his failure to win the hearts of many local political activists

Leading to victory of Hans….

State Spy #11:

Being a pragmatist, I expect all four incumbents to return. All of them have significant bases of support and frankly no one has angered any of their base. While Duchy is sometimes irrational, the general public does not see it and they have no reason to vote against her. I was offended by her piece which bragged about how she beat up on the unions about the budget, but some people probably liked it.

Hans has run a fantastic campaign and he certainly has a great deal of support. If anyone can pull off an upset I think it is he, but I still think that it is a long shot.

State Spy #12:

Hans Riemer. Great field. Good mail. Has broad endorsements.

Becky Wagner. Has teachers and she is prominent in their mailers. Undercurrent of voter frustration against current council. She has tapped it.

Marc Elrich. No enemies. Has endorsements. For four years, has gone to events in all corners of the County. Of all at-large council members, I have seen him the most at various events. Has not really alienated business, has labor support, has environmental and civic group support. Will be low turnout election and many of his constituencies vote.

Slight edge to Leventhal over Floreen. I think both are seen as emblematic of problems with current council on multiple fronts. Though they have varying and good mix of endorsements, I have seen lack-luster campaigns that rely predominantly on mail and existing name recognition.

Duchy Trachtenberg is not going to win. Lackluster mail. Hardly at events throughout the county. She’ll do well in her corner of the county, but not very well in the rest of the county. I think she could have won had she run a stronger campaign. She did not frame for voters why she should get another 4 years. If her message is fiscal responsibility, no one knows it’s her message.

Our spies’ tally:

George Leventhal: 12 (unanimous)
Marc Elrich: 12 (unanimous)
Hans Riemer: 8
Nancy Floreen: 7
Duchy Trachtenberg: 7
Becky Wagner: 2

Read More...

Thursday, September 09, 2010

George Leventhal's Second Mailer


Read More...

Wednesday, September 08, 2010

George Leventhal on Illegal Signs

At-Large County Council Member George Leventhal, who is running for reelection, sent us the following statement concerning illegal campaign signs.

Dear Adam,

Earlier this year, my campaign made the judgment that we would not place signs illegally in the public right-of-way or on property where we did not have permission. There have been a few occasions, such as along parade routes, where we temporarily placed signs but then removed them, and on at least one occasion, a volunteer placed our signs in the public right-of-way and again, we removed them.

I'm writing to let you know that, even though I have had volunteers ask me if they can put up my signs in the public right-of-way, my campaign policy remains not to do so. My impression is that signs in the public right-of-way create visual clutter and impose a burden on the taxpayer in these difficult budget times, because they must be removed by the State Highway Administration or county Department of Permitting Services. I understand that this policy may place me at some disadvantage in the closing days of the campaign when many other candidates for County Council, At-Large and other offices are placing illegal and unauthorized signs, but I believe my decision was the right one.

I would be delighted if you would place this statement on the Maryland Politics Watch blog.

Best,
George Leventhal
Montgomery County Councilmember, At-Large

Read More...

Saturday, September 04, 2010

At-Large MoCo Council Debate at the 4H in Chevy Chase

Thirteen candidates showed up in Chevy Chase tonight for the second to last candidate forum--or so I am told--of the at-large campaign season. The debate was sponsored by a panoply of municipalities and organizations from around the area. Channel 16 covered it so you should be able to watch it. Here are my impressions on how candidates struck people--less about the specifics of what they said and more about style.

As mayor, I got to introduce the candidates--a great example of a politician taking credit of the hard work of others in putting the forum together and Charles Duffy for moderating it. The candidates looked like they were ready to throw me off the stage when I suggested that elections are like reality TV in that you actually get to vote people off the island--a thought I admit was inspired by viewing of Top Chef last night and perhaps by a post on the delegate race in District 18 inspired by Project Runway four years ago. Perhaps I was on firmer ground when I spoke about all the important decisions they get to make.

George Gluck (Green) lost me when he said that the solution to the economic crisis in a nutshell is that we all need to stop shopping at Barnes and Noble in Bethesda and go to the Cricket Book Shop in Ashton instead to keep money and jobs in the County. Reinforced the impression of Greens as well-meaning but utterly impractical and a bit kooky.

Duchy Trachtenberg (D) had one really good theme that resonated well and one that sounded a little tinny to me. The good theme is making tough choices in tough times. In short, it makes a virtue out of Duchy's loss of political support from unions--a smart and sensible response to the choices she has made in office that fits the mood of the times--not to mention the Post. In contrast, Duchy recitation of Ike's endorsement and how we can only trust experienced hands now rang false as it left me wondering why one should have supported her four years ago.

Despite starting off the debate by complimenting his fellow incumbents, George Leventhal (D) quickly lost any chance of taking home the Mr. Congeniality statuette. A bull in a china shop, George is tough and argumentative rather than pleasant and controlled, and sometimes clever instead of convincing. His tone is the one I try to keep out of my classroom teaching--the one that suggests you're a real idiot if you disagree with me--reinforced with a frown and crossed arms. Folks, we even nearly had a Saturday Night Live moment brought to life when he went after Jane de Winter. But hey, I guess you can't argue with George's electoral success.

In contrast, Nancy Floreen (D) came across as an adult who has firm convictions and a grasp of the facts but keeps her head. Like George, Nancy has strong opinions and defends them armed with a quick mind and grasp of the issues.. However, she managed to make her points, and even correct people, without looking like she was berating them or being unpleasant. Not an easy balance but one Nancy carried out with conviction. Looked like a Council President.

Jane de Winter (D) benefited from being George's target and having a sense of humor about it as she turned George's attack on her fiscal sense and her advocacy for education into a family anecdote about an adult handling a child. One can debate about who won the point but the optics of standing up to a bully were good as Jane held her own as she made an impression--something challengers have to do. Seated wrongly as a "W" instead of a "D", de Winter got to sit in the center of the pack.

Raj Narayanan (D) came across as an outsider with economic knowledge but lost credibility when he urged the audience to vote for him and Marc Elrich--mainly because it looks weak and because he apparently urges support for himself and a different incumbent at each forum. Nonetheless, he was a fresh face to me and I enjoyed his contribution.

Hans Riemer (D) was the candidate who really gets that debates are not just about what you say but the impression you make. Though younger than the other Democrats, he came across as calm, likable, and knowing the notes he wanted to hit, particularly reinforcing the message of his recent mailer on seniors. Though some will ask where's the beef? his competitors did not press this point as at other forums.

Becky Wagner (D) had an ability to relate governmental problems to both her past experience and to make clear points on complex issues. As with Jane de Winter, I got the impression of someone who has worked hard in the community and earned her spot up there. Becky came across as clear-eyed even if one wondered about her stands on issues as her responses sometimes could be read a number of ways--not necessarily a bad thing when one is trying to corral voters with diverse opinions.

Marc Elrich (D) must have been good in the classroom. He has clear views but also looks like someone who is practical, knows a lot, is willing to talk calmly with others, and thinks that politics is about bringing people together to solve the community's problems. In short, another grown up. He elicited the only applause for the night when he mentioned his bus-rapid transit proposal.

Fred Evans (D) seemed like a nice enough fellow but did not leave much of a memory--bad news for any candidate, I'm afraid.

Robert Dyer (R) wanted you to know that he is the man with the fiscal plan. Very intense. I confess I don't know what to make of Republicans with pony tails. The repeated references to Fantasy Island didn't help. I resisted urges to stand up from the back of the auditorium and shout: "The plane! The plane!"

Mark Fennell (R) brags about being a tea-party candidate in his literature but oddly sounded more interested in making sure that developers pay their fair share for infrastructure in addition to standard Republican fiscal concerns. I preferred the guy on stage to his written materials. Mark is sort of an inverse Bob Ehrlich who looks great in his ads but really should never be allowed to debate.

Brandon Rippeon (R) woke me up with a resonant voice and a passionate presentation but then disappointed with his anodyne attack suggesting that increasing gang violence indicates that the county council has provided bad value for its money. Like Hans, Brandon is a young, fresh face but has a very different style.

Note: I have endorsed Marc Elrich and Jane de Winter. I apologize for any votes this loses them.

Read More...

Thursday, September 02, 2010

George Leventhal's First Mailer




Read More...

Wednesday, September 01, 2010

Let's Keep George Leventhal Working for Us

Read More...

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Heard a Good Rumor?

There are MANY rumors floating around in the County Council races right now. Let’s be irresponsible and review a couple of them, shall we?

1. The Rockville consensus is that Craig Rice should and will win the Council District 2 seat. No one believes Sharon Dooley has a shot, and no one in either the council building or the Executive Branch wants to see combative former Planning Board Chair Royce Hanson get in. As a result, lots of people are wooing Rice and hoping to earn his vote later. Ike Leggett, for example, gave Rice $3,000.

2. The at-large incumbents loathe Hans Riemer and are picking up their whisper campaign against him. More than one person who has publicly supported him has told your author that they have been pressured by one or more incumbents to retract that support. There has been an intense effort to discredit Riemer and plant derogatory allegations about him in the media. One such allegation is that he has never worked for AARP. Your author knows that is a lie because Riemer would answer the phone at AARP when called there by yours truly.

3. A civic activist who despises Council President Nancy Floreen has started an illegal, anonymous anti-Floreen website and has begun erecting illegally-placed road signs calling for her defeat. The activist is known to be a supporter of Council Member Marc Elrich. Elrich denies responsibility for fomenting the anti-Floreen effort, but his pleas are not entirely believed. Rumors are spreading that the activist is planning an attack mailer against Floreen. This is beginning to stress the incumbents’ four-way mutual non-aggression pact.

4. Council Member George Leventhal has taken an increasingly hard line against challenger Becky Wagner in the at-large candidate forums. Leventhal is suspected by many of tacitly supporting Wagner a year ago, a charge he denies, and some are now accusing him of throwing Wagner under the bus as part of the incumbents’ deal.

5. Council Member Duchy Trachtenberg is so upset about the growing circulation of stories about her mishandling money while she was Treasurer of Maryland NOW that she is vowing to locate their source. Perhaps she should blame the Gazette, which originally reported on the issue. Our informants are wondering whether distraction over this matter explains why Trachtenberg, who is sitting on over $200,000 in the bank, has apparently not yet sent out mail.

6. More than one council incumbent has recently butted heads with Council Vice-President Valerie Ervin, who will likely become President this December. That is EXTREMELY unwise as Ervin will be determining committee assignments, including chairmanships. Ervin is a tough cookie who will not tolerate mischief and will break heads if she has to.

7. We’ll finish with something positive. Yes, we know such things bore you, but you received plenty of dirt above, so deal with it. The County Council and the county’s statehouse delegation are often criticized for not talking to each other, but that could change for the better. One example is that Council Member Roger Berliner, who has significant expertise on energy policy, and Delegate Brian Feldman (D-15), who sits on the House committee that oversees electric utilities, are collaborating on legislation to establish performance standards for Pepco. We don’t care what they come up with, but the very fact that they are working together may be a sign of good things to come.

Read More...

Monday, August 23, 2010

Council At-Large: George Leventhal

Council Member George Leventhal finished first in the 2006 at-large Democratic primary. What does that mean this year?

First, some basic statistics on Leventhal along with his performance chart in 2006.


Electoral Experience
Two-term at-large incumbent. Finished fourth in 2002 as a member of the End Gridlock slate. Finished first in 2006. Former Chair of the Montgomery County Democratic Central Committee.

Areas of Strength, 2006
Almost everywhere. Leventhal finished first in four of five Council Districts and five of eight State Legislative Districts. He finished first in Silver Spring, Gaithersburg, Rockville, Germantown, Potomac, Chevy Chase and Olney, among MANY places.

Areas of Weakness, 2006
Finished fifth in Poolesville and fourth in Garrett Park and Dickerson. In other words, Leventhal had almost no geographic weaknesses.

Endorsements
In 2006, Leventhal had the Apple, the Post, lots of labor support, lots of business support… you name it, he had it, except for the Gazette. His endorsements are similarly numerous this year.

Campaign Receipts
$328,606 for the 2006 cycle, second only to Nancy Floreen. In the 2006 cycle through the Pre-Primary 1 report in 2006, Leventhal raised $285,246. In the 2010 cycle through the Pre-Primary 1 report in 2010, Leventhal has raised $257,353, a 10% decrease from the prior cycle.

What is Different Now
The Washington Post has targeted Leventhal for defeat over his dealings with the unions. We find the Post’s arguments against Leventhal to be unfair, but the Post is the lone political actor in the county that is unaccountable to anyone. (Witness the lack of consequence for the paper’s former practice of using a non-resident intern to write its local editorials.) Leventhal’s cash position is also not what it once was. In mid-August 2006, he had $132,162 in the bank. In mid-August 2010, he reported having $70,461.

Forecast

We do not believe the Post’s attacks or cash flow issues will seriously hinder Leventhal. He finished first in 2006 largely because he was the only at-large incumbent to hold a spot on the Apple Ballot, he had good financing and he had very broad institutional support. Not much has changed. George Leventhal is a strong incumbent who will return. We are picking Leventhal to finish first, with a second-place finish possible if fellow incumbent Marc Elrich improves his financial performance.

Tomorrow, we’ll look at Marc Elrich.

Read More...

Thursday, August 19, 2010

Council At-Large Geography, Part Four

The bottom line in any election is who wins and who loses. We’re not ready to make that call for 2010, but we know in excruciating detail how the 2006 contest played out. And now we reveal all!

Here are 2006 at-large Democratic primary results for the top five candidates for all voters casting ballots at precincts by Congressional District, State Legislative District, Council District and locality. Our statistics are limited by the fact that precinct-level data excludes absentee and provisional voters. But we are using the precinct data to zero in on the geographic areas where each candidate ran strong and weak. That information is indispensable for evaluating possible results in 2010.


We understand that there is a tremendous amount of data in the chart above – too much to be digested in any one sitting. And we will break it down further in individual analyses of the four incumbents later in the series. But for the moment, we offer a few notes.

1. George Leventhal was not only the top vote-getter, he was also the most reliable performer. Leventhal finished first in five of eight State Legislative Districts and four of five Council Districts.

2. Marc Elrich and Duchy Trachtenberg were nearly tied, with Elrich barely capturing the second spot. But as we shall see, their votes came from very different places.

3. Nancy Floreen and Mike Subin were the two incumbents left off the Apple Ballot. Even though Subin had served five terms while Floreen was a freshman, Floreen had more money and worked much harder to win reelection.

4. Sixty-five percent of the at-large votes came from four areas: Silver Spring (31.2%), Bethesda (12.8%), Rockville (11.7%) and Gaithersburg (8.9%). Any candidate who runs weak in any of those areas risks a loss.

5. The Apple Ballot included Leventhal, Elrich and Trachtenberg in 2006. The latter two were challengers but these three candidates finished at the top in that order. In 2010, the Apple Ballot includes two incumbents – Leventhal and Elrich – and two challengers – Hans Riemer and Becky Wagner. Two incumbents – Floreen and Trachtenberg – have been excluded. Despite the Post’s best efforts to destroy MCEA, that change will impact this year’s at-large race.

We’ll look at the individual candidates in greater detail next week.

Read More...

Tuesday, August 03, 2010

Council At-Large Incumbents Forge Non-Aggression Pact

The four County Council at-large incumbents – Marc Elrich, Nancy Floreen, George Leventhal and Duchy Trachtenberg – have struck a non-aggression pact for the remainder of the election season. While they have not formed a slate by any means, they have agreed to avoid going after each other and to reserve their fire for the challengers.

The pact, agreed to a couple weeks ago, contains the following elements.

1. None of the four will speak ill of each other in public. This covers campaign communications such as mailers and emails.

2. Elrich and Trachtenberg will endorse each other and Leventhal and Floreen will endorse each other, but there will not be a four-way mutual endorsement. Such a public display might irritate some of the supporters of the respective candidates.

3. None of the four will endorse any of the at-large challengers.

The non-aggression pact is the product of several factors.

1. Leventhal and Floreen do not care for Trachtenberg, but her reporting nearly $300,000 in campaign cash back in January convinced them that Trachtenberg can likely not be defeated.

2. Becky Wagner, who was regarded as a fair bet to defeat Trachtenberg last fall, has not caught on other than by landing MCEA’s endorsement. If she was making a stronger showing, more than one council incumbent might consider supporting her. Instead, she has chosen to go negative against the whole council.

3. None of the incumbents respect Hans Riemer. They regard him as a non-substantive candidate who has not lived in the county long enough to warrant election and does not know very much about county government. They dismiss his endorsements and campaign expertise, perhaps to their peril.

4. The incumbents were united by the budget process, during which they were attacked from all sides and hung together until the end. That was the first time that they realized they could put aside their differences and all work together.

5. All four believe that all of them will be coming back. But if a challenger breaks through, no one knows which incumbent would be headed home. So the safest thing for each incumbent as an individual to do is to circle the wagons.

This deal comes from a very different place than the slates in MoCo’s state legislative districts. The latter slates are populated, for the most part, by incumbents with histories of working together and minor policy differences. The at-large incumbents have waged bitter feuds over the years, especially Elrich versus former End Gridlock members Floreen and Leventhal and Trachtenberg versus Leventhal. The non-aggression pact is strictly a marriage – well, more like a limited cohabitation arrangement – of convenience.

But the pact is not without cost to its members. Many of Elrich’s supporters detest Leventhal and Floreen for supporting the ICC and accepting no limit on their developer contributions. Elrich has stressed the problem of developer contributions for MANY years to his significant benefit. So why would his supporters credit any accommodation he makes with candidates they view as the developers’ favorites? The unions will not smile on any deal struck by their endorsees with Duchy Trachtenberg, whom they regard as an arch-enemy. And the district Council Members can hardly be expected to fall in line as none of their interests were considered by the deal signers. Two of them (Valerie Ervin and Nancy Navarro) have already endorsed Riemer.

The deal may not hold over the long term, especially as other stake holders speak up. But if it does, the structure of the election is basically set. However much they may dislike each other, the incumbents will stand up for the council’s record – especially on the budget – while the challengers will hammer away from the outside. Whether the strategy works will be decided by the voters.

Read More...

Monday, July 26, 2010

George "Ol' Blue Eyes" Leventhal

The award for funniest answer on a questionnaire goes to at-large Council Member George Leventhal, who threw a zinger at MCGEO. The union asked him this question about the budget:

What, if any, regrets do you have?
Leventhal responded:

"Regrets, I've had a few. But then again, too few to mention. I did what I had to do and saw it through without exemption." - My Way, Frank Sinatra.
Here's what George should tell the Post.

Read More...

Monday, July 19, 2010

In Defense of George Leventhal

In its 2010 County Council endorsements, the Washington Post did not merely inform its readers as to the virtues of its picks; it also attacked Council Member George Leventhal. The Post said:

The one at-large incumbent we do not endorse is George L. Leventhal. A two-term council member, he has prodded the county to extend primary health care for uninsured and low-income residents and pushed other worthwhile initiatives involving transit and job growth. However, by pandering to public employee unions, he has also played a key role in fostering a culture of entitlement that led directly to unbridled spending, outrageous perks and irresponsible budgets. He was not alone in coddling the unions, but he led the charge.
The accusation that Leventhal bears primary responsibility for the county’s budget problems is both grossly unfair and breathtakingly hypocritical. Here’s why.

Montgomery County certainly has a record of substantial spending. Following is the total tax-supported spending of the county government since FY 2004, which was the first budget on which Leventhal voted.


But MANY people had a role in these increases, not just Leventhal. The key players on budget decision-making are:

1. The Superintendent of Schools, who negotiates the three school union contracts and proposes the public schools budget to the Board of Education. The current Superintendent is Jerry Weast, who has served since 1999, not George Leventhal. The Post has long been a cheerleader for Weast.

2. The Board of Education, which approves the union contracts negotiated by the Superintendent as well as the overall school budget. Leventhal has never been a school board member. Most sitting school board members have at some point been endorsed by the Post.

3. The County Executive, who negotiates non-school union contracts and proposes the overall budget to the council. Leventhal has not served in this position. Both Executives in recent years, Doug Duncan and Ike Leggett, have been endorsed by the Post. In fact, the Post called Duncan “the fifth, and best, county executive” immediately after his final term spending spree.

4. The Chair of the Education Committee, who reviews, changes and passes out the school budget. Since 2002, the occupants of this position have been Mike Subin, Mike Knapp and Valerie Ervin, all of whom have been endorsed by the Post. Leventhal has never served in this position.

5. The Council President, who bears overall responsibility for passing the budget. Since 2003, the Presidents have been Mike Subin, Steve Silverman, Tom Perez, George Leventhal, Marilyn Praisner, Mike Knapp, Phil Andrews and Nancy Floreen. All except Perez were endorsed by the Post.

To the extent blame must be assessed for the county’s budget problems, it cannot fall on Leventhal alone. He was one of many people – including the executives, school board members, Council Members and committee chairs – who backed the contracts and budgets of prior years. Those who bore greater responsibility were invariably supported by the Washington Post. And so the Post has told its readers to vote for a large group of politicians who have collectively spent more than it would like, but rather than accept its own responsibility, the Post pins all the blame on one Council Member merely because it is seeking to make an example of him in its feud with the teachers union.

Has the Post no shame?

Read More...

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Primaries to Watch IV, Part Four

By Marc Korman and Adam Pagnucco.

Here are races Four and Three!

4. Council At-Large
Previous Rank: #4

Marc
For a race with all four incumbents running, there is a lot of action here. With the filing deadline behind us, there are six challengers. Of the six, I would argue that at this point only two are serious contenders to knock off an incumbent: Hans Riemer and Becky Wagner. Both are running hard campaigns all around the County and secured the Apple Ballot. Riemer also nabbed the Post endorsement. Jane de Winter has also been running for fifteen months and working hard.

But the real question is whether any incumbent is actually vulnerable. Nancy Floreen was the loser in the Apple Ballot sweepstakes, but she has won without it twice before. Duchy Trachtenberg seems to be a popular target, but she has $350,000 which pays for a lot of mail. Marc Elrich will probably have the least money, but he has strong grassroots support and candidates in every race are praising his Bus Rapid Transit plan. The Apple Ballot and Post stamp of approval help his profile too. George Leventhal, the primary vote leader in 2006, seems to be the favorite for that slot again. Even the Washington Post gave him some praise while declining to endorse him, a courtesy they did not extend to many others they did not support.

There are some great challengers, but who are they going to beat?

Full disclosure, I am a public supporter of Hans Riemer.

Adam
The last assessment by the spies still mostly holds. There is a significant sentiment that all four incumbents will win. There are also those who think that Hans Riemer will beat one of them, although educated observers differ on whether Duchy Trachtenberg or Nancy Floreen is more vulnerable. Riemer is running the best campaign of any candidate and he is flying high because he and incumbent Marc Elrich are the only at-large contenders to get both the Apple Ballot and the Post endorsement. Becky Wagner has a lot of respect in some quarters of the county and still has an outside shot as long as she stays on message and avoids spats and rants. The Post is trying to pin all the county’s budget problems on incumbent George Leventhal, but the newspaper by itself cannot prevent him from coming back. We have noticed that the incumbents mainly bring their families or their council staffers to parades and other events, meaning that their ground games are not awesomely strong.

There are various phenomena operating just under the surface in the at-large campaign. They include:

1. The Possibility of Slates.
Last fall, many speculated that the Council Members who backed Nancy Floreen for President (Floreen, George Leventhal, Mike Knapp, Valerie Ervin and Nancy Navarro) might form a slate and try to knock out one of the other four. That idea was dashed by Ervin when she announced that challenger Hans Riemer was the only at-large candidate she would be backing. Now it seems more likely that at least some of the other four council incumbents – Roger Berliner, Phil Andrews, Duchy Trachtenberg and Marc Elrich – will be cooperating formally or informally. If they do, one of their priorities will be ensuring that Elrich, who refuses developer contributions, will have enough money to finance his mail. They may also choose to back an at-large challenger if they can find one who is both viable and politically acceptable.

2. Target: Floreen
Accordingly, some or all of the above four may go after Floreen. None of them agree with her on growth policy, none were impressed with her handling of the budget and all were unhappy at her successful wresting of the council presidency from Berliner. Now that she has been rejected by MCEA, some smell blood in the water. We have heard from multiple sources that there is a significant possibility that Floreen will be targeted by negative mail, either by a slate including one or more of the four who did not back her for the presidency or by an “independent” entity supported by them. Since Andrews has no opponent, Berliner is pulling away from Hopkins and Trachtenberg has more money than several regional banks, there is more than enough campaign cash to spare for a mailer or two against Floreen. Leventhal is not viewed as vulnerable enough for such tactics to have effect.

3. County Executive 2014
In part, the at-large race will be affected by the dynamics of the impending contest to succeed Ike Leggett in 2014. Leventhal is likely to run. Ervin would be foolish not to consider it, and she is no fool. There may be others. If Leventhal finishes first and Riemer does not win, Leventhal will project early strength for the Executive race. If Riemer wins with strong support from District 5 and non-white precincts, Ervin will look like a king-maker. If Riemer scores close to Leventhal or even outpolls him, Ervin will look even more formidable. But if Marc Elrich finishes first, his name will be bandied about. Trust us: all capable politicians think more than one step ahead, and the County Executive’s seat is a big step indeed.

3. District 17 State Senate
Previous Rank: #1

Marc
The rumor is that Jennie Forehand has begun to work, but what took her so long? Why let Cheryl Kagan get such a head start when the challenger has been open about her campaign for over a year? If Forehand loses, I think the post-mortem on her campaign will focus on the past year and Forehand’s failure to understand she was facing a serious threat. A similar scenario has unfolded in District 39. On the other hand, if Forehand pulls out a victory it will demonstrate the power of incumbency and slates.

Adam
Cheryl Kagan has the complete package for a candidate: smarts, savvy, charm, speaking ability, experience in campaigning and office-holding, work ethic and a methodical approach to the business of politicking. She is the kind of challenger that would pose problems for any incumbent and is running perhaps the best campaign in the county. But she has a conundrum to resolve: how to give voters a reason to get rid of Forehand. The incumbent is a pleasant, gracious and long-serving politician who has built up a base among regular, older voters who tend to dominate primaries with low turnout. Kagan has not tried to build a contrast with Forehand. It’s tricky given that the two have similar policy positions and no one wants to come across as beating up the nice grandmotherly lady next door.

If Forehand lets Kagan continue to hustle rings around her, she will lose. But if she picks it up, she could still survive.

We reveal the final two tomorrow!

Read More...