Monday, August 02, 2010

Big Daddy’s Hand Revealed in District 39

Recently released emails show the role of Senate President Mike “Big Daddy” Miller in trying to negotiate a peace settlement between Senator Nancy King (D-39) and Delegate Saqib Ali, who is now challenging her. The settlement attempt failed, but it demonstrated just how much attention Miller is paying to this district.

The incident began when MPW’s Marc Korman contacted King about posting a District 39 team ad in the county Democrats’ spring ball program. King asked the three Delegates – Ali, Kirill Reznik and Charles Barkley – about it in this email.

On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Nancy King wrote:

Dear Charlie, Saqib and Kirill,

I got an email from Marc Korman asking if we were going to do a team ad for the Spring Ball. If you are interested in doing maybe a half page ad from our team, can you let me know? Patty can put it together with our picture if you so choose.

Also, are any of you interested in doing a District 39 reception closer to District 39 in late April, as a wrap up/kickoff/Team 39 event? We could use the money we were going to use for the night in Annapolis and get more of our 39 constituents there.

We also need to get together to talk about team literature and possible team signs. Your thoughts on any of this? Thanks, Nancy
The reference to “Patty” indicates Patty Horton, who is King’s legislative aide.

Ali sent this reply to the other three legislators:

-----Original Message-----
From: Delegate Saqib Ali
To: Nancy King
Cc: Charles Barkley; Kirill Reznik
Sent: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 7:36 pm
Subject: Re: Team 39

Nancy,

You have called me "Crazed" and "Desperate" in the newspaper and made frivolous ethical allegations against me in an attempt to harm my reputation.

With due respect, don't you think you owe me a public apology before we even begin to think about "team"?

- Saqib
King sent the following email in return, but note the email trail that accompanies it. The source of the email was Patrick H. Murray, who sent it to King’s aide, Patty Horton.

From: Nancy King
Date: Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: Team 39
To: Saqib Ali, Nancy King
Cc: Charles Barkley, Kirill Reznik

Dear Saqib:

We have both said and done things – deliberately or inadvertently – that hurt each other, and our personal relationship and our public reputations have suffered as a result. The email you sent on Monday is the first time that either of us has confronted the other directly about the situation.

Neither one of us has clean hands here. You have waged an unrelenting campaign to undermine my professional reputation and personal credibility, including a public meeting where you called me a liar in front of our constituents.

This situation is unfair for the residents of District 39, who expect us to put aside our differences and focus on the problems that our State is facing. We must rise above our personal concerns and put our constituents first. If an apology will help you, please allow me to offer one.

I am sorry for any pain I have caused you as a result of my poorly-chosen words. Moreover, I am sorry that our relationship has reached a point where we read about each other in the newspaper and on blogs more often than we talk directly. It is of no value to the people we serve for us to continue to walk down such a rocky path.

I hope you will accept this in the spirit in which it was intended – as a good faith effort on my part to extend an olive branch and to begin rebuilding our relationship. I can think of nothing that would be better for the people we represent.

You are a passionate advocate, and you put your heart and soul into your work. You are a dynamic part of the District 39 team, and we would like to work with you. As I indicated in my first email, the team is preparing for post-session meetings. We need to know whether you want to work with us in order to accommodate your schedule and include you in our efforts.

Please let me know by the end of this week how you want to proceed.

Thank you again for your candor. I understand your frustration with the situation, because I share it. Again, I hope you will accept this as a good faith effort on my part to move forward as a team, so that we can best serve the people of District 39.

Sincerely,
Nancy

-----Original Message-----
From: Patty Horton
To: hearsawho@aol.com
Sent: Wed, Mar 10, 2010 10:14 am
Subject: Fwd:

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Patrick H. Murray
Date: March 10, 2010 9:11:35 AM EST
To: Patty Horton

Dear Saqib:

We have both said and done things – deliberately or inadvertently – that hurt each other, and our personal relationship and our public reputations have suffered as a result. The email you sent on Monday is the first time that either of us has confronted the other directly about the situation.

Neither one of us has clean hands here. You have waged an unrelenting campaign to undermine my professional reputation and personal credibility, culminating in a public meeting before session where you called me a liar in front of our constituents.

This situation is unfair for the residents of District 39, who expect us to put aside our differences and focus on the problems that our State is facing. We need to rise above our personal concerns and put our constituents first. If an apology will help you, please allow me to offer one.

I am sorry for any pain I have caused you as a result of my poorly-chosen words. Moreover, I am sorry that our relationship has reached a point where we read about each other in the newspaper and on blogs more often than we talk directly. It is of no value to the people we serve for us to continue to walk down such a rocky path.

I hope you will accept this in the spirit in which it was intended – as a good faith effort on my part to extend an olive branch and to begin rebuilding our relationship. I can think of nothing that would be better for the people we represent.

You are a passionate advocate, and you put your heart and soul into your work. You are a dynamic part of the District 39 team, and we would like to work with you. As I indicated in my first email, the team is preparing for post-session meetings. We need to know whether you want to work with us in order to accommodate your schedule and include you in our efforts.

Please let me know by the end of this week how you want to proceed.

Thank you again for your candor. I understand your frustration with the situation, because I share it. Again, I hope you will accept this as a good faith effort on my part to move forward as a team, so that we can best serve the people of District 39.

[SIG]
We all know what happened to this settlement attempt, but the key bit of info here is one name: Patrick Murray. He is Miller’s Deputy Chief of Staff, but he is FAR more than that. Murray is a senior strategist in Big Daddy’s service, acting as his eyes and ears in all things political. The fact that Murray was involved in drafting communication between King and Ali demonstrates both how difficult that relationship had become by March as well as the level of attention it was drawing from Miller. It also shows how close King really is to Big Daddy.

The Lords of Annapolis – and not just Miller – share a common view of King and Ali. They regard King as a solid citizen who does not cause trouble. They regard Ali as… well, this is a family blog, so we can’t print those kinds of words. The bottom line is that they DO NOT WANT SAQIB IN THE SENATE. You can bet that Big Daddy’s participation in this race will not be limited to peace offerings or rumored push polls. By the time this primary is over, there will be a lot of blood on the floor in District 39.

16 comments:

Daniel Vovak said...

If Saqib Ali wins this primary, this will probably become a Republican senate seat, and Miller knows it. Every Democrat should vote for Saqib!

Catherine said...

Mike Miller doesn't want Saqib Ali in the Senate? I think that's reason enough to support him!

Catherine Liow

Tom said...

Your readership might be better served if you could elaborate on why Ali is considered a troublemaker.

Tom Steele

Tom said...

Also, I can think of worse things to have than a good working relationship with the President of the Senate; not having a good working relationship with my colleagues, for example.


Tom Steele

jsmdlawyer said...

I'm surprised that no one has yet to comment on the complete idiocy of Nancy King sending out an e-mail which makes clear that her "heartfelt apology" was actually written by somebody else, in this case Mike Miller's staffer. Doesn't anyone from the King campaign know how to cut and paste text from one e-mail to another?

I have no dog in this fight whatsoever, but that's embarrassing.

Jonathan Shurberg

David said...

As a resident of D-39, I want a State Senator who is able to get results. In order to get results, they need to have the respect of their colleagues in both chambers of the legislature in order to pass legislation they propose.

During the past legislative session, 10 of Senator King’s bill passed and became law, including 4 bond bills that provide financial resources for projects that improve the daily life of the residents of District 39, and Senate Bill 476 which prevented a $23.4 million penalty being imposed on MCPS from the State for failing to meet the Maintenance of Effort.

For me the choice is clear, Senator King gets results that benefit the residents of D-39 and the state of Maryland.

David Heller
Lifelong resident of Montgomery County
District 39 resident of 10 years.

Don Mewha said...

Mr. Heller,

As another resident of District 39, and someone that knows both candidates personally, I can say that they're both able legislators that work hard for their constituency. They also both have the respect of the other members of the D 39 slate (Delegates Reznik and Barkley)...to imply otherwise is distasteful.

My concern with this is that Senate President Miller has a well-known bias against Montgomery County...which should concern a lifelong resident considering the dire financial straits that the State finds itself in for the upcoming fiscal year...which is a large part of why I'm supporting Delegate Ali in this election.

Hamza Khan said...

Mr. Mehwa,

Unfortunately, Delegate Ali is known to have a poor working relationship with not only the powers that be (Senator Miller), but with many of his colleagues in the House, and has poor relationships with many in the Senate as well.

This is not a judgement on the Delegate, just an unfortunate truth. While the question of "why?" is a legitimate one (it may very well be that Delegate Ali is a crusader for justice and truth who's fighting a machine), the truth of the matter still remains: there is no love to be lost between much of the legislature's membership and Saqib.

That can (and will) seriously impede a junior Senator from being too effective a legislator. Just look at Delegate Ali's record in the House: he was no prodigious producer of passed laws. In contrast, Delegates Reznick, Rice, and other freshmen made huge strides as lawmakers in their first term, and are Delegate Ali's contemporaries.

While I must admit I am not a resident of District 39, I still have to ask: why vote against a woman with a solid record and impeccable credentials as a lawmaker and citizen for another candidate, regardless of their and of their remarkable energy and youthful vigor? I regretfully conclude that Delegate Ali has a bright future as a lawmaker, just not yet.

Hamza Khan

*Full disclosure: I have endorsed and and contributed to Senator King this election cycle*

Don Mewha said...

Mr. Khan,

The answer to that is simple:

Senator Miller has long had Montgomery County in his sights when it comes to funding issues. As you seem to be fairly knowledgeable with regards to state politics, I'm sure this doesn't come as news to you in any way, shape or form.

While there are times that working relationships with the powers that be are important, there are times that its more important to stand up and say what needs to be said, regardless of the reception they receive.

People that spoke out against slavery before the Civil War were right, even if they weren't popular.

People that spoke out against the Jim Crow Laws before the Civil Rights Movement were right, even if they weren't popular.

Nancy has indeed worked tirelessly for District 39, and her service should be applauded, but in this particular case it seems to me that her experience and relationships are precisely part of the problem...what good is maintaining relationships when those relationships are detrimental to your constituency?

Saqib is willing to take stands that might not make other people in Annapolis happy, but are the right stands to take.

And in a blatant theft from your post (the sincerest form of flattery, after all), I have to ask you a question: If Delegate Ali is such a gifted legislator, what about him has inspired you to fund and endorse someone in whose district you don't even live?

- Don M.

Tom said...

First off, Senator King is not Miller's lap dog.

Secondly, I fail to see how being reflexively confrontational with the President of the Senate benefits D39.

Tom Steele

Don Mewha said...

Tom,

To address your points: I didn't say that Senator King is Senator Miller's lapdog. I said that her relationship with him might lead her to be more open to his suggestions that Delegate Ali might be.

Secondly, Delegate Ali isn't reflexively confrontational...but he is steadfast about the issues he feels strongly about.

There have been problems in Annapolis. I don't think any of us would be foolish enough to deny this fact. The problems are by no means Nancy's fault, but there comes a time when you need to make a change for one reason or another.
Saqib represents a possibility to change things up a bit.

I also found it distasteful in the extreme to hear mudslinging during the debate between Senator King and Delegate Ali.

It was incredibly disappointing, and Nancy should be above that.

TwinMom said...

I accept that I will be perceived as having a bias here, given that I am Saqib's Legislative Director, and have been for nearly two years. But I believe it's worth pointing out, even at this late date, that some of the comments prior to mine are unsubstantiated rumor-mongering.

Saqib gets along with lots of his fellow delegates in Annapolis and quite a few Senators. Representing the constituents of District 39 and the residents of Montgomery County is important to him -- but it doesn't mean that he isn't able to work with others who come, like everyone in Annapolis, from throughout the state (hopefully) with the same goals in mind. It's an interesting three months; three months of listening and learning and making decisions that are the result of some incredible teamwork. And Saqib has most definitely been a part of that team.

BTW, Mr. Heller, there wasn't a MoCo Senator or Delegate who wasn't critical to the passage of that penalty waiver. And it took citizen involvement as well -- so call your friendly PTA and give them a pat on the back too.

Merry Eisner

Daniel Vovak said...

Saqib said an interesting comment to me today. Then he left the Gazette and Nancy had a comment. This isn't over.

Adam Pagnucco said...

Come on, Wig Man, spill it. You know that half of District 39 is reading this comment thread. What did Saqib and Nancy say?

Daniel Vovak said...

lol. I have been so fair, here. I'll let Ali talk first. (Or Nancy can.) It's good info, too.

Robin Ficker said...

Mike Miller wants to load up Montgomery County taxpayers with state teacher pension costs and Ali won't stand for it.