Thursday, February 19, 2009

MoCo Board of Elections: Close the Precincts

Montgomery County Board of Elections Executive Director Margaret Jurgensen is recommending that the county consolidate its polling places from 45 precincts to 22 for the upcoming special election. She cites potential savings of $47,000 in Election Judge payments and $7,000 in training costs. She believes the precinct closings are justified by low turnouts, but omits the fact that precinct closings are likely to further deter turnouts. Jurgensen's recommendation comes despite the fact that the County Council has already voted to oppose precinct closings. We reprint her memo below.

February 19, 2009

To: Montgomery County Board of Elections

From: Margaret Jurgensen, Election Director

Re: Polling places for the Special Elections for Council District 4

I am attached for your consideration the following items:

Calendar for the upcoming election

Polling place list representing two plans;

1. Consolidate precincts

2. Precincts available to the Board for use in special elections.

The staff of the Board of Elections recommends that the Board permit the consolidation of polling places for the County Council District 4 Special Election. It is our belief that with historically low voter turnouts for Special Elections, concerns of the school officials related to student safety and lack of parking at certain school facilities and the county administrations expressed request to contain costs related to the conduct of elections. the proposed solution of consolidating voting precincts to 22 locations is a reasonable response to cost containment. Additionally, the Election Judges have contacted the office to voice their opinion that precincts could be combined because the day is very slow due to a low turnout. Savings from consolidation of precincts would be around $47,000 in Election Judge payments and $7,000 in training costs. Board of Elections staff will be required to send postcards to notify the voters of these polling place changes. The sample ballot will be mailed with the ballot face and information regarding the polling place address, as always. Election Day will be easier to manage with internal staff as it will reduce locations in one half to verify compliance to the conduct of the election.

The County Council requested in their Resolution to the Board of Elections to use the same polling places as in the November 2008 election. If the Board directs the staff to return to all precincts used last fall, the Board will be allowed back into all locations but four. The three churches and Wheaton Moose Lodge have indicated that we should locate elsewhere this year. The advantage to this plan is voters will not be confused as to the location of their precinct to vote.

The County Council expressed their concern that moving voting sites will depress voter turnout and if the polling place is moved, additional signage will not motivate voters to vote at the temporary site. The disadvantage to this plan is parking at the schools remains a problem, some parents will complain about strangers allowed into the school for voting and Election Judges will again face a slow day with few voters. Chief Tom Manger from Montgomery County Police did attend the Council meeting and promised that the parking issues on the street and in the parking lots would be managed successfully Board staff will mail to the four precincts the location of the new voting centers. Staff will mail the sample ballot and have included a statement to encourage voting during those hours not associated with school start and dismissal times.

Staff will need a decision at the Board meeting on Monday. We will need to begin meeting with each school principal and building services manager to determine the location of the voting area in the building and install phone lines for communication links for all polling places.. We will not have the same location in the buildings as used in November in most cases but will be directed to sites used in the Special Elections. The school system will accommodate either decision

3 comments:

foolio said...

This is terrible. Isn't the BOE's mission to encourage participation? How does shutting down over half of the polling locations achieve that? This election will cost over $1 million, and they're trying to save $50K? This doesn't make any sense and it smacks of a voter suppression tactic.

Moi said...

LatinoJustice PRLDEF, a leading national civil rights organization recently sent this letter to Phil Andrews.


Dear Council President Andrews:

It has come to our attention that the Montgomery County Council is considering reducing the
number of polling places in an upcoming special election for voters to elect a new Councilperson
to replace the recently deceased councilmember representing the county's Fourth District. On
behalf of LatinoJustice PRLDEF, we strongly urge you and the Montgomery County
Councilmembers not to reduce the number of polling sites in the upcoming Special Election
which would detrimentally impact Latino and other Minority voters and constitute a possible
violation of law.

LatinoJustice PRLDEF is a national non-partisan, non-profit civil rights organization founded in
1972 to promote and protect the civil rights of the pan- Latino community. Since our inception,
we have worked extensively throughout the country, but particularly in the Eastern United States to combat efforts that, even though well meaning, may result in suppression of the Latino or other minority vote. Last year we joined with other national Latino and legal groups including the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law National Campaign for Fair Elections in an unprecedented non-partisan election protection campaign during the primaries and general election. We worked extensively in a number of Eastern states during last year's election season, and organized a Spanish language election protection hotline that served Latino voters in Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South
Carolina and Virginia.

LatinoJustice PRLDEF has had a long history of enforcing the rights of Latino and other
minority voters through education, advocacy, as well as taking legal action when necessary to
protect their rights to vote. We have brought a number of lawsuits to enforce the Voting Rights
Act which requires certain states and localities accommodate "language minorities" who speak
languages other than English to ensure they are not being disenfranchised.

Most recently, we sued Volusia County, Florida on November 4th
, 2008 on behalf of Latino
voters to challenge the County Board of Elections' failure to provide bilingual ballots to Latino
voters, thereby depriving them of the meaningful opportunity to fully comprehend their ballot in
violation of the Voting Rights Act.
We understand a recent Gazette article cites to recently deceased Councilmember Don Praisner
who "spoke from the grave" asking that no special election be held owing to economic concerns.
(Ironically the late Don Praisner was elected during a special election last year to succeed his
wife, Marilyn, who also died in office; during her 17 years on the council, she was reported to be
a strong supporter of conducting special elections based on the 1998 enabling legislation
amending the County's Charter.)

Although we understand the County's concern about the
possible expense of holding another special election in these challenging economic times, we
vehemently oppose any attempt to save money by curtailing access to the franchise. We likewise
find that the prospect of elected positions being filled by something other than a true popular
vote will lead to widespread resentment that the people's will has not been complied with.
Unfortunately, we believe that the proposal for reducing polling sites is being advanced by many
of those who supported the successful white candidate against the Latina candidate in the 2008
special election. Inasmuch as the Fourth District has an increasingly significant number of Latino and African-American voters among the districts within the County, we cannot view the
proposed closure of polling places neutrally. This smacks of the intentional disenfranchisement
of Latino/a or African-American voters in a blatant attempt to impede the opportunity and
candidacy of minority candidates from being successful. Therefore, any decision to reduce
electoral opportunities for minority candidates and to restrict access to available polling sites raises the specter that County actions have the purpose or effect of violating the rights of minority voters under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
In closing, we respectfully urge that the special election be conducted in the same manner as the
general election. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at
212-219-3360. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,
~~~
Jose Perez
Associate General Counsel
LatinoJustice, PRLDEF
Latinolustice PRLDEF
99 Hudson Street, 14th floor
New York, NY 10013-2815
Tel: 2122193360
Fax: 212 4314276
8003282322
2
Jackson Chin
Associate Counsel
LatinoJustice PRLDEF

cc: Montgomery Council Councilmembers by email
Roger Berliner, Vice president
councilmember. berliner@montgomerycountymd.gov
Marc EIrich
councilmember .elrichCd{montgomerycountymd. gOY
Valerie Ervin
councilmember.ervin@montgomerycountymd.gov
Nancy Floreen
councilmember.floreen@montgomerycountymd.gov
Mike Knapp
councilmem ber. knapp@montgomerycountymd.gov
George Leventhal
councilmember.leventhal@montgomerycountymd.gov
Duchy Trachtenberg
councilmember.trachtenberg@montgomerycountymd.gov

Kevin Gillogly said...

Reading through the fine print you can see that the BoE says that they will send out mailings to alert voters of the precinct changes. Great like I am going to trust the staff to do this correctly. This from an organization that failed to put electronic voter cards in the all of the precincts during the 2006 primary and the same group sent out a mailing last year that had wrong information on it so it had to remailed and got out late and also during the special election I got the sample ballot the day of the election. I have serious doubts about their ability to communicate the changes when their track record is about as a poor as one can get for a government entity.

The elected council said "no" to this idea earlier this month and the BoE's staff response is to ignore the wishes of people that have actually been elected to something. The BoE staff is politically tone deaf.

Finally it is interesting that the memo comes from the staff and not from the appointed officers (3 Ds and 2 Rs) meaning either the partisan officers are using the Executive Director as cover for their own wishes or the staff runs things to fit their needs ignoring their supposed superiors.

Heck while they are at it maybe they should be able to set their salaries and budget and just inform the council what it is after the fact. Who needs input from outsiders when all wisdom resides in offices on Twinbrook Parkway.