By Laura Howell, Executive Director, Maryland Association for Community Services.
Developmental disabilities, like Down Syndrome, Cerebral Palsy and Autism, begin in childhood and prevent people from living independently without substantial help. Over 22,000 adults and children with developmental disabilities receive community based services, including residential, employment and day programs. Over 19,000 people with developmental disabilities are on the State’s Waiting List for these same services, and thousands of people waiting are in crisis.
When state coffers were full, the State largely neglected these important services, both refusing to provide minimally adequate inflation rates, and limiting access to services for people, many of whom continue to be in crisis.
Because Maryland now faces serious fiscal challenges, policy-makers want everyone to “share the pain.” This would be a more equitable proposition if people with developmental disabilities had shared in the good times as well, but this did not happen.
One in three developmental disability providers already have a negative operating margin. If the state cuts funding for services that are already significantly under-funded, it will create a severe crisis. Likely repercussions will include discontinuation of services for some people, especially those with significant disabilities, discharging of people who require uncompensated care, and closing of programs that are no longer fiscally viable. In addition, the basic safety and health of some people with disabilities may be jeopardized.
Some argue that if state employees must feel the pain, so too should direct support staff in the community. However, the workers in the community continue to earn far less that their counterparts in state institutions. Whereas the state reimburses community providers $9.18 per hour for direct support workers, recent job postings showed starting wages of $12.42 per hour for state employees. Although efforts by the State and providers to raise the low wages of community-based staff have improved the situation, community staff still lag behind their state peers. Telling community workers to “share the pain” will only push the best employees to better-paying jobs in other community settings, such as nursing homes and assisted living providers, and people with disabilities will suffer.
Lastly, reducing access to essential care and supports will ultimately increase the costs to the State of Maryland by shifting costs to state institutions, hospitals, and Medicaid.
Marylanders with developmental disabilities can not afford any further reductions in funding. While state policy-makers face difficult choices to balance the budget, this is one area they cannot afford to cut.
For the independent fiscal analysis by the Community Services Reimbursement Rate Commission of developmental disability providers in the community, visit here.
For information on the thousands of people waiting for developmental disability services in Maryland, visit here.
And for briefing on funding for developmental disability services and direct support staff wages, see the following document.



Tuesday, August 18, 2009
People with Developmental Disabilities at Risk of Losing Services
Posted by
Adam Pagnucco
at
5:00 PM
Labels: budget, disabilities, Laura Howell
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


12 comments:
this is really dreadful. i was shocked by the graph that shows how funding for these essential services has been so abysmal for years. and to think they could cut funding further now -- it's unconscionable. when we are we going to care enough about individuals with developmental disabilities to provide adequate funding for services they can't live without?
Anna Oman
Budget cuts are moral choices, and to balance the budget on the backs of people with developmental disabilities is simply unconscionable.
I know it's late, but there will be a rally at Lawyer's Mall in Annapolis tomorrow morning at 10:30 run by Arc of Montgomery.
To think that lawmakers and other elected officials are seriously considering making further cuts that would greatly affect services for individuals with developmental disabilities in Maryland is mind-blowing. The State pushed to move these people out of state institutional placements and into community settings, which was a great win for the population, but now they seem to want to drop the ball on continuing to support Maryland's most vulnerable citizens. Just as this blog article said, it would be one thing to say people with developmental disabilities like autism must share the budget burden if they had "shared in the wealth" when Maryland was seeing better times, but they never have, as is clear by the graphs and briefing paper linked in this blog. To make a group who has already had to fight tooth and nail to receive everyday, taken-for-granted services like access to recreational programs, jobs, homes and residential lives that are in their community, not some 500 miles away in an institution, suffer more losses and more cuts to their basic services, is not okay, and Marylanders need to say that to lawmakers right now.
I am a Director of a small Vocational Services program in Frederick and Carroll counties that is funded by DDA and managed by the local Goodwill. My direct service staff is paid in the $9.00 per hour range, significantly less thatn State employees in similar jobs. Even with the lower hourly wages, my agency is supplementing the DDA program with revenues from our retail stores. Without the supplemental income, we would not be able to provide the DDA services. Currently, donations are down in our retail stores so we do not have a guaranteed income to increase our retail supplement if these cuts go through. We may have to cut services. Individuals with developmental disabilities want to work and be contributing members of our society. However, many are unable to do so without staff support to find the job, transport them to work and coach them at the job site. Please consider that families and employers rely on our services to support people with developmental disabilities. Without services, these individuals would probably not be employed or have access to their community.
It is very hard and I dare say impossible to provide the quality of services that individuals need should the funding levels be further cut. People with disabilities are deserving of fully funded care.
David A. Greenberg
President and CEO
The League for People with Disabilities
Gov. O'Malley has been a tremendous disazppoint in this area he has consistantly under funded the area of DD in his budget and allowed the waiting list to grow. He has done done so in spite of reaptedly saying on the campaign trail that he believed in the "dignity and worth of humang being and that it was "government's duty to care for the least among us. I also deeply dissapointed in Peter and Nancy for supporting his suggestion as members of the Board of Public Works to eliminate the COLA for direct care staff.
Aaron Kaufman
I am beyond shocked and outraged to hear that the State may be cutting funding of community programs for people with developmental disabilities. It was bad enough that these underfunded agencies lost the minimal .9% that finally got into the budget. Whatever happened to priorities? How can this Administration with good conscience cut funding for our State's most vulnerable people? We endanger those in services and make even more hopeless the long lists of those desperately in need. As a parent, I fear for my daughter's future, even though she receives services from well-managed agencies. As a Marylander, I despair of a government that can even consider such a cut.
19,000 individuals waiting for services that they qualify for under the law is a disgrace. Maryland is one of the wealthiest states. Maryland politicians claim to be leaders, however, since 2004 they have lead the waiting list up from 9600 to the now more than 19,000. Then they consider cutting funding for those in the front lines of providing care -- those caregivers who are struggling every day with limited resources to maintain the quality of life for those on the waiting list. Outrageous. I understand the economic crisis is a stressor on budgets, but I urge everyone to consider the personal stress and tragedies that play out in the homes of the 19,000 every single day. If our leaders cannot solve this human calamity in our state then I suggest we may need to look for new leaders. I say to the leaders – Sell Rosewood, close Bradenburg Center and Potomac Center (save the money and raise the level of care for all). Find the funding(yes, even if the “T” word is necessary). If you cannot serve the most needy of your constituents then the illusion of equality for all, truly is an illusion.
As a parent with a 21 year old non-verbal child with MR, CP, Autism and seizure disorders (oh, he can still open doors and run down the street) I have offered more than once to have elected officials and others in positions of authority to visit my home at any time to see what life is like on the waiting list. None have come by.
For all those reading this please hold those folks in Annapolis accountable, ask questions, go get involved. To the elected “leaders” out there -- Please, either LEAD or get out of the way.
Dan Schmitt, just a parent to Chris…
For too long we have allowed the discussion over community-based services to be about cost savings and not appropriate care. It is imperative that these services not be cut any more. It would be penny wise and pound foolish to do so. Further cuts could result in more people being moved back into more costly, less appropriate state institutions.
During some of the past few years, community service providers have seen their state reimbursement rates increased by a "cost-of-living-adjustment" or COLA. This rate adjustment was needed to help cover increasing costs of electricity, gas, food, health care, etc. not just wages for employees.
Unfortunately, the state uses the same term COLA to refer to state employee pay increases. The result has been to confuse the two COLAs and to assume they are the same. They are not. Therefore, these providers cannot be asked to share in the pain. They are already having to absorb many increases in the cost of serving their clients within current revenues. They cannot take more. The families of those the serve cannot take much more. This item must be off the table.
Please excause my early typos my disabilty aeffors my success with spelling and proofreading
Thanks,
Aaron Kaufman
For too long we have allowed the discussion over community-based services to be about cost savings and not appropriate care. It is imperative that these services not be cut any more. It would be penny wise and pound foolish to do so. Further cuts could result in more people being moved back into more costly, less appropriate state institutions.
During some of the past few years, community service providers have seen their state reimbursement rates increased by a "cost-of-living-adjustment" or COLA. This rate adjustment was needed to help cover increasing costs of electricity, gas, food, health care, etc. not just wages for employees.
Unfortunately, the state uses the same term COLA to refer to state employee pay increases. The result has been to confuse the two COLAs and to assume they are the same. They are not. Therefore, these providers cannot be asked to share in the pain. They are already having to absorb many increases in the cost of serving their clients within current revenues. They cannot take more. The families of those the serve cannot take much more. This item must be off the table.
Post a Comment