Showing posts with label Porcari. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Porcari. Show all posts

Monday, March 05, 2007

Out of Power, Out of Ideas, But Not Out of Breath

Former Assistant Secretary Carol Arscott penned a column in the Gazette which contains the now standard Republican bleating about the unfair media bias against Republicans. Her whinge centers on media treatment of transportation issues:

Maryland Republicans insist that Maryland Democrats can do anything and get away with it. There is no better example of the Republicans’ axiom than the reaction — or lack thereof — to the Feb. 22 bombshell announcement by Gov. Martin O’Malley’s secretary of transportation, John Porcari, that none of Maryland’s three major new transit projects — the Corridor Cities Transitway, the Purple Line or the Red Line in Baltimore — will go to public hearing this year as planned.

If Gov. Bob Ehrlich’s transportation secretary, Bob Flanagan, had dropped news of a major schedule slip in just one of those all-important transit projects during a legislative hearing, he would have been lucky to escape the building alive. There would have been rallies and demonstrations and editorials, all decrying the transit-hating Ehrlich administration.

But with Ehrlich gone, and no other whipping boy handy, public reaction to the announcement has ranged from muted to nonexistent.
This column is breathtaking in its audacity. After all, regardless of what one thinks of Transportation Secretary Porcari, these delays are hardly his fault. The delays in the environmental impact statements and the errors in ridership estimates are facts that would have come to light regardless of who was elected governor. Porcari just probably allowed them to become public sooner than they would have if Ehrlich and Arscott remained in power.

The column nonetheless has one good point. Arscott is correct that O'Malley, like her former boss Ehrlich, still has yet to figure out how to pay for the new projects.

Read More...

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Post: Purple Line Delayed

The Washington Post finally reported the widely known news on the Purple Line:

Maryland officials said yesterday that three major transit projects, two of them aimed at using light rail or express buses to ease traffic in the Washington suburbs, will likely be delayed about a year because of a flawed study that underestimated the number of riders.

State Transportation Secretary John D. Porcari said Metro's proposed Purple Line between Bethesda and New Carrollton, a transit link between Shady Grove and Clarksburg and the Red Line in Baltimore have been shelved while Maryland and its consultants work on new projections.

Porcari said that the state had planned to hold public hearings on draft environmental studies of the projects this spring but that they will likely be pushed to 2008. "Ridership numbers were wrong, and people were reluctant to face up to that," Porcari said. "I am not at all happy about this."
Shoot, even Maryland Politics Watch reported this news one week ago.

Read More...

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Purple Line Update

One piece of good and one piece of bad news for supporters and opponents of the Purple Line. Transportation Secretary John Porcari announced the Environmental Impact Study (or is it Survey?) will be delayed by a year for the Purple Line so the timetable for moving on that project has been moved back by at least a year. And don't forget that next year is when the rubber will meet the road in terms of figuring out how to deal with the State's exisiting structural deficit even before we figure out how to pay for new transportation projects.

Apparently, there was also a glitch in doing the math on the ridership estimates. Porcari says that projected ridership is 20-25% higher than originally suspected for the Purple Line. Of course, 20-25% higher than exactly what number is rather critical to whether this is a viable transportation project but Purple Line supporters undoubtedly regard this report as good new. Nevertheless, Porcari appeared to throw cold water on the ridership of the Purple Line in an interview with the Gazette despite his past strong support for the Purple Line.

Read More...

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Porcari on Transportation Projects

The Gazette interviewed Maryland Transportation Secretary John Porcari. Here is what he said towards the end about various transportation projects competing for funds:

Q: What about expanding the Red Line in Baltimore?

A: We want ... consensus. ... We don’t need warring advisory committees [or] counterproductive discussions about what’s appropriate and what’s not. We’ve had some discussions ... [about] trying to combine the two committees.

Q: On building the Metrorail Purple Line [between Bethesda and New Carrollton]?

A: A more refined model of ridership would serve the project well. Before you get to the specific alignments, the transit modes, you need a better understanding of the ridership potential. A corollary of that is tying it to local land-use plans. We’re working very closely with both Montgomery and Prince George’s County to make sure we are maximizing the potential for transit-oriented development.

Q: On Corridor Cities Transitway [a proposed busline between the Shady Grove Metro station and Clarksburg and perhaps Frederick]?

A: Maryland Transit Authority has ‘‘request for expression of interest” out to see if there’s any private interest for public-private partnership that would include the Corridor Cities Transitway in the 270 corridor.

Q: On building a second crossing over the Potomac River?

A: The difficulty is, if it makes sense to have a crossing, finding an alignment that works for both Virginia and Maryland. Our land uses are almost opposite on two sides of the river.

Q: On building a Route 301 bypass at Waldorf?

A: Some of the worst traffic congestion in the state is in Waldorf. The bypass is sorely needed. We’ve been working with county commissioners on preserving right-of-way for an alignment that works [and is mindful of the environmental issues].

Q: On augmenting Route 301’s Governor Nice Bridge from Southern Maryland to Virginia?

A: The bridge itself will need rehabilitation in the midterm. The question is ... whether a parallel span is needed. That’s one of the things the transportation authority is looking at now.

Q: On creating ferry service from Southern Maryland to the Eastern Shore?

A: It [would] require a substantial operating subsidy. Connecting Southern Maryland to the lower Shore does make a lot of sense ... [but] it’s not clear that ferry service, seasonal or year-round, would be cost-effective.

Fascinating that a man known for being a strong Purple Line advocate makes comments that are non-committal to say the least. Does anyone have any idea what these comments mean?

Meanwhile, Prince George's municipal officials rallied against the ICC and for the Purple Line.

Read More...